Jun 20, 2006 (CIDRAP News) – The US emergency medical care system is woefully inadequate and unprepared for a pandemic, bioterrorist attack, natural disaster, or other national crisis, three recent reports from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) conclude.The nation’s emergency care system, the reports say, is overburdened, underfunded, and too fragmented to communicate and cooperate effectively across levels and geographic areas. It has little surge capacity to deal with a disaster. In addition, emergency care staff members are often not adequately trained to respond to large-scale disasters or to work with pediatric patients.The IOM report preceded by 2 days a Department of Homeland Security report that describes major shortcomings in the nation’s general preparedness for catastrophic events such as category 5 hurricanes.Emergency system needs comprehensive help”Unfortunately, the [emergency care] system’s capacity is not keeping pace with the increasing demands being placed on it,” said Gail L. Warden, MHA, in a Jun 14 news release from the National Academies, the IOM’s parent organization.”We need a comprehensive effort to shore up America’s emergency medical care resources and fix problems that can threaten the health and lives of people in the midst of a crisis,” added Warden, chair of the committee that wrote the reports and president emeritus of Henry Ford Health System in Detroit.To remedy this situation, the committee that wrote the reports recommends that:Congress appropriate at least $325.5 million toward shoring up the emergency care system—plus funding for readying the system for potential disasters.The emergency care system be “regionalized” so that neighboring hospitals, emergency medical services, and other agencies work together to provide care for all the people in their region.The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) be integrated into civilian disaster planning and management.Guidelines on overcrowding and redirecting ambulances away from packed emergency departments (EDs) be enforced, and coordination and communication between facilities improved.Streamlining tools, such as queuing theory, dashboard systems, and 23-hour observation units, be used to optimize patient treatment and flow.The IOM’s 26-member Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System convened in September 2003. Its conclusions on problem areas and recommended solutions have just been published as a series of three reports: Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point, Emergency Medical Services at the Crossroads, and Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains.Concerning funding, an IOM overall summary of the three documents states, “Perhaps the area in which greater funding is most important is disaster preparedness. To date, despite their importance in any response to disaster, the various parts of the emergency care system have received very little of the funds that Congress has dispensed for disaster preparedness.”In part this is because the money tends to be funneled through public safety agencies that consider medical care to be a low priority. Congress should therefore make significantly more disaster-preparation funds available to the emergency system through dedicated funding,” the summary says.Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point specifies the following preparedness funding priorities:Strengthening and sustaining trauma care systemsEnhancing ED, trauma center, and inpatient surge capacityImproving EMS response to explosivesDesigning evidence-based training programsIncreasing the availability of decontamination showers, standby intensive care unit capacity, negative-pressure rooms, and appropriate personal protective equipmentConducting international collaborative research on the civilian consequences of conventional-weapons terrorismIn addition to asking for more preparedness funding, the IOM committee says Congress should establish a pool of $50 million to reimburse hospitals for uncompensated emergency and trauma care.Also, in the next 5 years Congress should provide $88 million to foster coordination and “regionalization” of emergency care and $187.5 million to address shortcomings in emergency pediatric care, the reports conclude.Regional coordination urgedRegionalization would involve directing patients not to just the nearest medical center, but to the nearest facility in the region equipped to handle patients’ specific needs. It “can improve health outcomes, mitigate overcrowding, and reduce costs,” according to the IOM news release.Regionalization would also eliminate the need for every hospital to maintain on-call services for every specialty, which would help address staff shortages caused by decreasing numbers of specialists willing to take emergency calls, the news release said.Hospital-Based Emergency Care says the VHA is “well positioned to enhance regional response, particularly since its hospitals are required by law to maintain excess capacity.” Therefore, the report says, federal organizations should work with states to integrate the VHA into regional disaster planning.To remedy overcrowding and ambulance diversions, the committee asked that the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) reinstate strong guidelines to reduce crowding, “boarding” patients in halls or exam rooms until beds become available, and diverting ambulances when EDs are overcrowded. It also called on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to convene a working group to develop standards to address the situation.Further, the reports note, overcrowding and ambulance diversions are caused by lack of coordination and communication between facilities. Patient admission and transport should be better coordinated across municipalities, the reports conclude.In recommending using queuing theory to help improve efficiency, the committee highlighted its ability to smooth the peaks and valleys of patient admissions, which can eliminate bottlenecks, improve care, and lower costs.The 23-hour observation unit, or clinical decision unit, the reports say, can help ED staff with patient triage, which can help reduce ED crowding. And dashboard systems can help coordinate patient flow.DHS reports on preparedness for catastrophesIn another lengthy report, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Jun 16 assessed the nation’s preparedness for catastrophes such as a major terrorist attack or a category 5 hurricane. The assessment included all 56 states and territories, as well as 75 urban areas.The assessment was ordered by President Bush and Congress in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, according to a DHS news release. Last February the agency released a report based on preparedness self-assessments by states and major cities; the new report represents the findings of expert “peer review teams” that visited the states and cities and checked their plans against national standards.Among the key findings in the Nationwide Plan Review for states and urban areas are:Most planning processes are not adequate as defined in the National Response Plan (NRP).A common deficiency in state and urban areas is the absence of a clearly defined command structure.The ability to give the public accurate, timely information should be strengthened.Significant weaknesses in evacuation planning are of profound concern.Resource management is the “Achilles heel” of emergency planning.Among the key findings for the federal government are:Clear guidance needs to be developed on how state and local governments can coordinate operations with federal partners according to the NRP.Collaboration between government and non-governmental organizations should be strengthened at all levels.Federal, state, and local governments should work with the private sector to optimize transportation of people with disabilities before, during, and after an emergency.The federal government should provide leadership, guidance, and resources necessary to build a shared national homeland security planning system.See also:IOM’s “Future of Emergency Care” seriesNational Academies Jun 14 press release
– Congress approves financial reportWAYNE Forde, president of the Guyana Football Federation (GFF), assured his affiliates and stakeholders of the game of football, that the Federation’s finances are in good hands, despite receiving a ‘Qualified Opinion’ on their Audited Financial Statements for the year ending December 31, 2016, which was done by Ram and McRae, Chartered Accountants, Professional Services Firm.According to Ram and McRae, one of the country’s leading Chartered Accounting firms, the GFF did not maintain adequate documentation of transactions with suppliers and consequently, Ram and McRae were unable to determine the accuracy, validity and completeness of accounts payable and accruals slated at $89,881,316 in the financial statements. Of this amount, a total of 48,320,142 was supported by third party confirmations and other audit evidence.Additionally, the report stated, adequate documentation for expenses paid during the year under review, totalling $2,319,499 was not provided during our test of controls.According to the findings of the Financial Audits, the GFF did not maintain adequate documentation in respect of game and other income stated at $21,051,698 in the financial statements, of which a total of $16,834,029 was supported by receipts and other audit evidence.Eighteen affiliated members of the GFF participated in yesterday’s Extraordinary Congress, where 17 voted to approve the 2016 Audited Statements.Forde said that his executive committee campaigned on bringing integrity to the game, and they’ve not strayed from that mantra.Chronicle Sport, in an article published on December 14, spoke about the over $45M unaccounted debts and income claims, according to Ram and McRae’s Audits. However, Forde called the article misleading, adding that since the publication, several concerned stakeholders reached out for an explanation.Forde said the article painted a picture that his administration was careless with the trusted finances, and that monies were missing, when in fact, that was not the case.The GFF president assured the public that under his watch and that of his executive committee, transparency will forever be the order of the day, with their only purpose in office being to see the development of the game on all fronts in the most professional manner, all done in accordance with FIFA’s rules. A qualified opinion is a statement issued after an audit is done by a professional auditor that suggests the information provided was limited in scope and/or the company being audited has not maintained generally accepted accounting principles.Auditors who deem audits as qualified opinions are advising whoever is reading the document that the information within the audit is not complete or the accounting methods used by the company do not follow generally accepted accounting principles.A qualified opinion is typically given due to a limitation of scope in which the auditor was not able to gather sufficient evidence for various aspects of the financial statements.Without sufficient verification of transactions, an unqualified opinion may not be given.A qualified opinion is suitable when accounting procedures used do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. Inadequate disclosures in the notes to the financial statements, estimation uncertainty or the lack of a statement of cash flows are also grounds for a qualified opinion.